As usual, it is all about Obama. Our Warriors are but pawns in supporting his political future...
Showing posts with label Jihad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jihad. Show all posts
9/02/2012
Out of Touch
Labels:
Election 2012,
Jihad,
Liberal Idiocracy,
Obamateurism,
Propaganda,
Terrorism,
War
5/09/2010
A Lexicon has been...failed
Last week when talking of the attempted Times Square car bombing, President Obama said the following:
However the most interesting word in that quote from the President is 'they'. Who *is* 'they'??
If we depend upon the White House's official statements, we will never know. for as it turns out, the words words 'terrorism', 'jihad', 'Islam', and even 'enemy' are no longer welcome in the official lexicon of theGlobal War on Terror Overseas Contingency Operations.
There are two recent looks at this 'phenomenon'.
First from the aforementioned Weekly Standard "Don’t Mention the War", in which authors Stephen Hayes and Thomas Jocelyn ask:
Great. We apparently want to avoid offending those who would instill us with terror (and death), by not engaging in “the politics of fear.” As Glenn Reynolds likes to say, the country is in the very best of hands.
In addition to the Weekly Standard, PJTV released an instructive look at how the lexicon has changed in the past several years.
In their video "Censorship of Islamic Terminology" from April 23d, you will see how along with 'terrorism' the offending terms 'jihad', 'Islam', and even 'enemy' are totally absent from important Obama Administration documents like the National Intelligence Strategy, FBI Counter-Terrorism Lexicon, and Lesson from Ft Hood report.

I wonder what words might be included in the report on the "Times Square Incident"? Recent evidence does not inspire confidence. I guess the real question should be...is this best categorized as cultural sensitivity, or appeasement?
At the very least, this should inspire a rise in billboard space rental....

...They will stop at nothing to kill and disrupt our way of life. But once again, an attempted attack has been—failed...Awkward phrasing to say the least, but as the Weekly Standard says, "It is as if the president wanted to say the attack “has been thwarted” but then realized he could not. The attack failed because Shahzad did not do a better job of constructing his makeshift bomb. No government agency can take credit for that."
However the most interesting word in that quote from the President is 'they'. Who *is* 'they'??
If we depend upon the White House's official statements, we will never know. for as it turns out, the words words 'terrorism', 'jihad', 'Islam', and even 'enemy' are no longer welcome in the official lexicon of the
There are two recent looks at this 'phenomenon'.
First from the aforementioned Weekly Standard "Don’t Mention the War", in which authors Stephen Hayes and Thomas Jocelyn ask:
"Why does the Obama administration find it so hard to utter the words ‘terrorism’ and ‘jihad’ and ‘Islamic extremism’?"Near the end of their article they cite the incomparable Janet Napolitano, who said she doesn't use the word terrorism in order to avoid “the politics of fear.”
[...]
So, three attacks in six months, by attackers with connections to the global jihadist network—connections that administration officials have gone out of their way to diminish.
The most striking thing about all three attacks is not what we heard, but what we haven’t heard. There has been very little talk about the global war that the Obama administration sometimes acknowledges we are fighting and virtually nothing about what motivates our enemy: radical Islam.
This is no accident.
Great. We apparently want to avoid offending those who would instill us with terror (and death), by not engaging in “the politics of fear.” As Glenn Reynolds likes to say, the country is in the very best of hands.
In addition to the Weekly Standard, PJTV released an instructive look at how the lexicon has changed in the past several years.
In their video "Censorship of Islamic Terminology" from April 23d, you will see how along with 'terrorism' the offending terms 'jihad', 'Islam', and even 'enemy' are totally absent from important Obama Administration documents like the National Intelligence Strategy, FBI Counter-Terrorism Lexicon, and Lesson from Ft Hood report.

I wonder what words might be included in the report on the "Times Square Incident"? Recent evidence does not inspire confidence. I guess the real question should be...is this best categorized as cultural sensitivity, or appeasement?
At the very least, this should inspire a rise in billboard space rental....
Labels:
Crisis,
Islamism,
Jihad,
Liberal Idiocracy,
Obama,
Obamateurism,
Smart Diplomacy,
Terrorism,
War
1/24/2010
Not the Intended Message
From the front in parts of Europe that may soon be called Eurabia....

I cannot imagine that then Candidate Obama ever thought that his message of hope would be used to promote a cult of death...
[Hat Tip: Diana West]

I cannot imagine that then Candidate Obama ever thought that his message of hope would be used to promote a cult of death...
[Hat Tip: Diana West]
12/01/2009
Obama Afghanistan Speech Word Count
President Obama's Afghanistan Speech Word Count: 'I' - 45, 'Afghanistan' - 39, 'Victory' - 0
Here is the word cloud for the speech:

(Wordle removes the most common english words, thus 'I' does not appear)
Here is the word cloud for the speech:

(Wordle removes the most common english words, thus 'I' does not appear)
11/18/2009
Shocking CIA Torture News
ABC News bring us the shocking news of a CIA secret prison....
They go on to reveal the horrors that went on there...
Oooops. That last quote wasn't from the ABC report, it was from an old Daily Mail report on the torture under the Saddam Hussein regime.
Here is the *torture* Mr. Sifton says happened at this alleged CIA location:
Oh the horror!
Let us compare those two again.
Let be realistic. One is torture, and one is essentially severe inconvenience.
Actually, the second example sounds like most C-130 flights I had in and out of Iraq and Afghanistan....
EXCLUSIVE: CIA Secret 'Torture' Prison Found at Fancy Horseback Riding Academy
The CIA built one of its secret European prisons inside an exclusive riding academy outside Vilnius, Lithuania, a current Lithuanian government official and a former U.S. intelligence official told ABC News this week.
[...]
"The activities in that prison were illegal," said human rights researcher John Sifton.
They go on to reveal the horrors that went on there...
They included eye-gouging; piercing of hands with an electric drill; suspension from a ceiling; electric shock; rape and other forms of sexual abuse; beating of the soles of feet; mock executions; extinguishing cigarettes on the body; and acid baths.
Oooops. That last quote wasn't from the ABC report, it was from an old Daily Mail report on the torture under the Saddam Hussein regime.
Here is the *torture* Mr. Sifton says happened at this alleged CIA location:
The activities in that prison were illegal," said human rights researcher John Sifton. "They included various forms of torture, including sleep deprivation, forced standing, painful stress positions."
Oh the horror!
Let us compare those two again.
- eye-gouging; piercing of hands with an electric drill; suspension from a ceiling; electric shock; rape and other forms of sexual abuse; beating of the soles of feet; mock executions; extinguishing cigarettes on the body; and acid bathsYeah, I can see the equivalence now.
- sleep deprivation, forced standing, painful stress positions
Let be realistic. One is torture, and one is essentially severe inconvenience.
Actually, the second example sounds like most C-130 flights I had in and out of Iraq and Afghanistan....
11/12/2009
The Myopia of Incomprehensibility
Claudia Rosett sums the President's 'incomprehensible' conclusion about FT Hood....
Indeed
Obama's muddled message at Fort Hood
[...]
[President]"These Americans did not die on a foreign field of battle. They were killed here, on American soil, in the heart of this great state and the heart of this great American community. This is the fact that makes the tragedy even more painful, even more incomprehensible."
[...]
In the media, the question of the hour is how the military could have missed the warning signs of Hasan's impending attack. Such details are important, and it would be a great idea to have better mechanisms (or any mechanisms at all?) within the military to catch the warning signs and act in time. But vigilance of that kind starts at the top. Right now the biggest warning sign of all is a president who looks at a pattern of jihadi communications, recruiting and attacks on America, and tells the public that the bloodshed at Fort Hood is "incomprehensible."
Indeed
Labels:
Jihad,
Liberal Idiocracy,
Obama,
Terrorism,
War
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)